Paul Scherer Institute (PSI)

Good, old Gasification meets High-Tech Fuel Cells

Hello everybody,

    I learned from Johannes about this forum. Just like Johannes, I did a PhD at Paul Scherrer Institut and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich in the field of Biomass Gasification. I wish I had known this forum back then because one of the goals of my thesis was to come up with a fixed bed gasifier in the 5 to 30 kWth scale which would operate at least one week non-stop. Fortunately, I did succeed in the end as you can read in my thesis.

      Electricity from wood through the combination of gasification and solid oxide fuel cells

      Demonstrations: 
      Economics: 
      Gas Conditioning: 
      Authors: 
      Engines: 
      Processes: 
      Practical Application: 
      Country: 

      Production of synthetic natural gas in a fluidized bed reactor

      Jan Kopyscinski, April 2010

      Hello everybody,

      This is my first message here in this forum. My former colleague (Johannes) sent you already the link to my PhD-Thesis (see below). I just want to give some more information about my work as a Doctoral Student at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich) and at the Paul Scherrer Institute (www.psi.ch).

      In the last 4 years I conducted research in the project Bio-SNG and Methane-from-wood, so-called synthetic or substitute natural gas (SNG) from wood. Detailed information about the process can be found in my recent published review article in Fuel 2010 (Title: Production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) from coal and dry biomass - A technology review from 1950 to 2009) (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.01.027).

      The aim of my work has been to understand the different processes within the fluidized bed methanation reactor by both experiments and modeling.

      The outline is as follows:

      1. Theoretical background: Methanation (kinetic, reaction mechanism, carbon deposition, technology review from 1950 until today)
      2. Investigation of the kinetic parameters of the methanation for our catalyst and conditions.
      3. Spatially-resolved gas concentration and temperatur measurment in a fluidized bed methanation reactor. --> Hydrodynamics, mass transfer and kinetic effects.
      4. Modeling of the fluidized bed methanation reactor.

      Title: Production of synthetic natural gas in a fluidized bed reactor - Understanding the hydrodynamic, mass transfer and kinetic effects.

      http://e-collection.ethbib.ethz.ch/view/eth:1059

      If you have any questions or comments please do not hesitate and contact me:

      Dr. sc. Jan Kopyscinski
      General Energy Research Department
      Paul Scherrer Institute
      5232 Villigen PSI
      Switzerland

      Email Jan.Kopyscinski@psi.ch or Jan.Kopy@web.de

      Best regards

      Jan

      ABSTRACT

      As the demand for energy is increasing world wide, not only the security of energy
      supply and the stability of prices, but also climate change has become an important
      issue. The production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) via thermochemical
      conversion of biomass and subsequent methanation could be one route to address
      these issues. The advantages are the high conversion efficiency, the already existing
      gas distribution infrastructure, the well-established and efficient end-use
      technologies and the recovery of a concentrated CO2 stream without any additional
      cost and thus the possibility for an easy carbon capture and sequestration.
      Already in the 1960s, the need for the production of synthetic natural gas arose to
      fulfill the increasing demand of natural gas. In the following 20 years, different
      methanation processes were developed from coal to synthetic natural gas.
      However, only one commercial plant was erected in 1984 and has been producing
      SNG ever since. Today, biomass is the feedstock of choice to produce SNG. At the
      end of the year 2008, the first pre-commercial plant was completed and the first
      wood was converted into methane-rich gas within the European project Bio-SNG.
      Paul Scherrer Instiute (PSI) and its project partners developed a 1 MWSNG fluidized
      bed methanation reactor based on the knowledge gained by bench-scale
      experiments and first model approaches.

      The advantages of a fluidized bed methanation reactor compared to fixed bed
      methanation reactors are the isothermal operation, the easy controlling, the
      possibility for the in-situ water gas shift reaction to adjust the H2/CO ratio, and the
      lower risk of catalyst deactivation due to recirculation of the catalyst particles
      through the bed.

      This thesis aims to increase the understanding of the different processes within a
      fluidized bed methanation reactor. A deeper inside was gained by dedicated
      experiments using spatially resolved measurement techniques not only in a benchscale
      fluidized bed reactor, but also in a catalytic plate reactor. In the latter, a large
      number of kinetic data were collected and the influence of the temperature as well
      as of the partial pressure of reactants and products were studied under technically
      relevant conditions. A one-dimensional model of the catalytic plate reactor was
      developed and the kinetic model parameters of the proposed Langmuir-
      Hinshelwood rate expressions were estimated by comparing simulated and
      measured gas composition profiles. The predicted model results are in excellent
      agreement with the experimental data.

      The purpose of the fluidized bed experiments was to investigate experimentally the
      influences of hydrodynamics, mass transfer, and chemical effects in the
      methanation reactor. In these experiments the catalyst mass, the gas velocity, and
      the degree of dilution were varied. It was found out that the main conversion
      occurs within the first 20 mm of the bed (CO-rich part) and that the mass transfer
      between bubble and dense phase is dominating in the upper part of the bed (COlean
      part). Further, it was shown that the hydrodynamics (especially the gas
      velocity) seem to have a stronger influence than the chemical space velocity. With
      higher gas velocity, the catalyst particles are moving faster through the CO-rich
      part of the bed, which leads to a better heat transfer and no temperature hotspots
      in the entrance region. However, higher gas velocity goes along with higher gas
      bypassing through the bed in forms of bubbles. That means that not all gas from
      the bubble phase is transferred to the dense phase, where the reactions are taking
      place. The consequence is a lower conversion. To assure high CO and H2
      conversion, the bed height can be increased. After each fluidized bed experiment,
      catalyst samples were taken and analyzed with respect to carbon deposition using
      temperature-programmed oxidation (TPO). For that purpose, a TPO method was
      developed to distinguish between different carbon depositions on the catalyst
      surface. The analysis of the catalyst samples showed no evidence of carbon
      depositions in form of polymeric carbon.

      A simple homogeneous two-phase fluidized bed model was developed using
      hydrodynamic parameters from the literature and kinetic parameters determined
      within this work. Modeling of the bench-scale unit showed that the initial slope of
      the gas composition profiles and the outlet composition could be reproduced. The
      calculated and measured gas compositions in the middle part of the reactor are not
      in good agreement. It is still not clear how to describe correctly the effect of
      volume contraction due to the methanation reaction on the mass transfer, the
      bubble size, and the bubble gas hold-up. In addition, all the hydrodynamic
      correlations used are based on measurements at ambient temperature and pressure
      in larger fluidized beds without reaction. Thus, the correlations may not be valid
      for small bench-scale units and may not consider the influence of volume
      contraction.

      Products: 

      Grass for Power Generation

      Grass for Power Generation
      Johanes Judex, PSI April 2010

      Hello everybody,

      I have learned from this gasification network since three years and I learned a lot.
      Thank you all, for sharing much information.

      Most of the time I stayed in the background but now I want to post the link to my PhD thesis I did at the ETH Zuerich and Paul Scherrer Institut in Biomass Gasification.

      I am not a native english writer so you will excuse the formal mistakes I made. Anyway I did my best to present:

      Grass for power generation -- extending the fuel flexibility for IGCC power plants
      http://e-collection.ethbib.ethz.ch/eserv/eth:1070/eth-1070-02.pdf

      The outline of the work is as follows:

      The fuel: natural native grass (extensive), wood
      The gasifiers: bubbling fluidised bed (5-10kW) & single pellet reactor
      The sampling: continuous wet scrubber
      The diagnostik: GC, GC/MS, ICP-OES, TC, Karl-Fischer, Draeger tubes, SID
      The parameters: Lambda, temperature, bed material
      The goal: Stable operation, product gas clean enough for gas turbine applications
      The result: you have to read it and decide for yourself

      Well, I hope there is something for everybody in this work.

      Cheers,

      jO.hannes

      Country: 
      Practical Application: 
      Subscribe to Paul Scherer Institute (PSI)